Parsing the Prescriptive Prerogative: Fiduciary and Best Interest Obligations in the Regulation of Financial Advice

Adam B. Fovent

ABSTRACT

Since the Financial Crisis of 2007-2008, fiduciary and fiduciary-like ā€œbest interestā€ obligations have occupied center stage in competing efforts to regulate the provision of financial advice. These efforts have spanned the United States Department of Laborā€™s controversial failed attempt to expand the reach of investment adviser fiduciary status with respect to employee retirement plans, the Securities and Exchange Commissionā€™s Regulation Best Interest and Fiduciary Interpretation concerning the standard of conduct required of broker-dealers and registered investment advisors, respectively, and proposed and final rulemakings from multiple states, including Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Nevada. Each such effort to incorporate fiduciary and fiduciary-like ā€œbest interestā€ obligations into regimes for the regulation of financial advice must grapple with a fundamental design issue that besets regulation more generally ā€“ the degree of precision and detail with which to articulate legal commands.

This paper examines the implications of the nature and conceptual foundations of fiduciary and fiduciary-like ā€œbest interestā€ obligations for this question of precisional optimality, demonstrating that the efficacy of such obligations requires, or at least traditionally presupposes, a broad, prophylactic approach to the articulation of legal commands. This paper then examines the various recent regulatory initiatives, along with judge-made and international comparators, in order to develop a typology of regulatory design approaches along the twin dimensions of ā€œruleā€-like precisional detail and ā€œstandardā€-like prophylactic breadth. By doing so, regulatory design approaches are identified that may allow statutory and regulatory drafters to better balance the prophylactic benefits of broadly articulated fiduciary and fiduciary-like obligations with the increased certainty and cost benefits of more detailed and precise specifications.